But so far no sweeping change in the basic 2:1 1:2 has arisen. This should mean trade up should be more valuable than trade down. Ove teh past year plus the market has become nearly 100% trade Down. LOLÄ«etween the need for one Era down for Negotiations, and Research, the fact also that a lot of players give high level Goods to lower level players to trade down, and players get high level Goods from Truce Tower too. Trading ups are so rare they seem to be snached up by players not needing those Goods. The largest problem facing the Market in the past year is the fact one Era previous is in such high demand, that the Market is totally dominated by trading down. I agree with the 1:2 2:1 as Fair between adjacent Eras, though it seems there are still players (Agent327?) who do not think so. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. I have based all calculations on the 4 and 8 hour production costs for. The system is locked into trades that ratio between 2:1 and 1:2 however players do jump multiple Era to try for or to give better deals. Hello all, I have created a tool to help assist in posting fair trades. And the standard 2:1 1:2 base is accepted again by pretty much everyone as Fair. In the past year that has nearly completely disappeared from use. Historically some players trid to change the sytem of what was called fair trade (2:1 trade down and 1:2 trade up each adjacent Era to a sort of cost based system that was rather complicated in the higher Era, but insisted on by some Guilds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |